Legal Opinion

Selectmen of Norwood v. New York & New England Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 15, 1894PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Three petitions, under St. 1890, c. 428, for the abolition of certain grade crossings in the town of Norwood. The first two petitions, both filed September 22, 1890, by the selectmen of the town of Norwood, alleged that Washington and Guild Streets, public ways in that town, crossed the tracks of the New York and New England Railroad Company at grade, and representing that “ it is necessary for the security and convenience of the public that an alteration should be made in…

Read the full summary

Three petitions, under St. 1890, c. 428, for the abolition of certain grade crossings in the town of Norwood. The first two petitions, both filed September 22, 1890, by the selectmen of the town of Norwood, alleged that Washington and Guild Streets, public ways in that town, crossed the tracks of the New York and New England Railroad Company at grade, and representing that “ it is necessary for the security and convenience of the public that an alteration should be made in said crossing, in the approaches thereto, in the location of said public way, and in the grades thereof, so as to avoid a…

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, J.

This case comes to us on exceptions of the New York and New England Railroad Company to rulings in the Superior Court, and on an appeal by the same party, involving substantially the same questions as those raised by the bill of exceptions. There are also exceptions of one Shattuck, a landowner, who claimed a right to appear before the court and be heard as a party. There are three petitions under the statute of 1890, c. 428, two by the selectmen of Norwood, and one by the New York and New England Railroad Company, which were ordered to be consolidated and heard as one. They relate to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Budd v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Chicago, Burlington, & Quincy Railroad v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Holyoke Co. v. LymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Davis v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Commonwealth v. Town of HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Sears v. Board of AldermenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  4. Donham v. Public Service CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. Attorney General v. Haverhill Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API