Legal Opinion

State v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1946No. 34,144PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magney, Justice.

In a proceeding to determine paternity, there was a verdict for defendant. The state appeals from an order denying its motion for a -new trial.

In view of the claimed error, it is necessary to make a detailed review of the evidence. The complaining witness, Muriel A. Anderson, was born April 2, 1927. She met defendant for the first time on March’17, 1944, at a lunchroom or tavern in St. Paul, where she had been visiting an aunt for two days. Her home was at Forest Lake, where she was employed in a restaurant. Defendant worked in St. Paul, but his home was- on a farm eight miles…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. Ashton v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. State v. WallenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SaxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. State v. OverbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. State v. SaxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API