Legal Opinion

Sorbaro Co. v. Capital Video Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 8, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, to rescind a lease, the defendant appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), entered August 9, 1996, which, after a nonjury trial, rescinded the lease and dismissed the defendant’s second through sixth counterclaims.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff-landlord commenced this action to rescind a commercial lease with the defendant-tenant after discovering that the defendant intended to use the demised premises primarily to sell videotapes, magazines, and related…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jo Ann Homes at Bellmore, Inc. v. DworetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Dzubey v. Teachers' CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. F. Nathanson & Co. v. MarinelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sokolow, Dunaud, Mercadier & Carreras LLP v. LacherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Hirschmann v. HassapoyannesNew York Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API