Legal Opinion
Rutland v. General Accident Fire & Life Assur. Corp.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 4, 1941No. 2221PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Le BLANC, Judge.
Plaintiff has filed this suit to recover compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of this State, Act No. 20 of 1914 as amended, at the rate of $20 per week for a period not exceeding 300 weeks, beginning October 28, 1939, less the sum of $60 which represents three weeks’ compensation which he alleges has already been paid him. His demand is made against the General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd., of Perth, Scotland, which, he alleges, was carrying compensation insurance in order to protect one W. F. Gillespie, who was at the time engaged in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Benjamin v. Standard Acc. Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Rodgers v. City of HammondLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
3Cited by9 opinions
- Smith v. Crossett Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- Franz v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
- Carpenter v. MaddenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Prater v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
- Fields v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.