Legal Opinion

Federal Maritime Commission v. Aktiebolaget Svenska Amerika Linien

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 6, 1968No. 257PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

The question presented in these cases is whether the Federal Maritime Commission properly disapproved two provisions of several shipping conference agreements. One of the provisions under attack, the so-called tying rule, prohibits travel agents who book passage on ships participating in the conferences from selling passage on competing, nonconference lines. The second provision, known as the unanimity rule, requires unanimous action by conference members before the maximum rate of commissions payable to travel agents may be changed.

The Commission’s authority in this area stems from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. McLean Trucking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Federal Maritime Board v. Isbrandtsen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Federal Maritime Commission v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States Lines, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America, Hapag-Lloyd A. G., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API