State v. Roscoe
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
II
Discussion
A
The Prosecutor's Closing Argument
The defendant argues that the trial justice erred by failing to declare a mistrial after the prosecutor made inappropriate, pungent, vulgar, and inaccurate remarks during the course of his closing argument. In this regard, defendant argues that the prosecutor strayed beyond the bounds of proper conduct during his closing arguments in three separate instances: (1) the prosecutor referred to the rules of hearsay as the reason he "couldn't say things[,]" (2)
*1237the prosecutor misstated the medical examiner's testimony, and (3) the prosecutor claimed…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State of Iowa v. Hillary Lee TylerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Thomas Ryan v. David H. Miller, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Thomas SanchezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019
- State v. Carlton VoseSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2023
- State v. Leopoldo BelenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019
- State v. Matthew SheridanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2021
- State v. Matthew SheridanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.