Legal Opinion
Gulshan Madan v. Cox Automative Corporate Services, LLC, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 14, 2026No. 2:26-cv-02114Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GULSHAN MADAN, No. 2:26-cv-02114-DJC-JDP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COX AUTOMATIVE CORPORATE 15 SERVICES, LLC, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Gulshan Madan filed this action in Sacramento County Superior Court, 19 and Defendants removed the case to this Court based on diversity of citizenship. 20 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (ECF No. 10), which argues 21 this Court lacks jurisdiction because the parties are not completely diverse. For the 22 reasons stated below,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Susan Kanter Sharon Plunk v. Warner-Lambert Co. And Pfizer Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.