Legal Opinion

Tapp v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1966No. 30,670PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRakestraw, J.

The appellant was charged by affidavit with the crime of armed robbery, and was convicted after a jury trial.

At his trial, appellant was represented by counsel of his own choosing. After his motion for new trial was overruled, he filed a petition for an attorney to represent him on appeal at public expense. His petition was granted and this appeal was taken.

After the appellant’s brief had been filed, the State filed a motion to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment for the following reasons:

1) The appellant did not incorporate in his brief a concise statement of so much of the record as…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Myslinski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Bates v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API