Legal Opinion

Cassard v. Hinmann

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided November 15, 1856PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Demurrer to separate parts of the defendant’s answer.

1Opinion of the Court

Hoffman, Justice.

The complaint in this action states, that the defendant, Hinmann, on the 13th of May, 1856, agreed to *85sell to the plaintiff 500 barrels of mess pork, deliverable all the month of September, 1856, at the rate of $17 per barrel, cash on delivery: the seller to give the buyer five days’ notice to receive and pay for the same. The contract is dated in New-York. The complaint avers the expiration of the time agreed upon; that the defendant had omitted to give,the notice; a demand for the delivery of the pork, and a refusal. The plaintiff asks judgment for his damages.

The defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brush v. KeelerNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  2. Regan v. PriestNew York Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Copley v. Doran & Wright Co.New York Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API