Legal Opinion
United States v. Cadillac Overall Supply Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 28, 1978No. 77-5076PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES C. HILL, Circuit Judge:
This is a criminal anti-trust case. Appellant Cadillac Overall Supply Company (Cadillac) appeals, following a bench trial, from the verdict and judgment finding it guilty of conspiring to restrain interstate commerce by allocating customers in the rental of industrial garments in several counties in South Florida in violation of Section One of the Sherman Act. 15 U.S.C. § 1.
Cadillac presents seven enumerations of error. These are:(1) That the trial court erred in ruling that the indictment sufficiently alleged a restraint of interstate commerce.(2) That there was…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v. Hydrolevel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. MarinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Edward Rodriguez, A/K/A Rick, Thomas J. Albernaz, Peter Smigowski, and William John MartinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Suntar Roofing, Inc. And David Kevin PrattCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Tondalaya Evans v. Books-A-MillionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.