Legal Opinion

La Fromboise v. Porter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1933No. Docket No. 186, Calendar No. 36,854PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

With the modification that costs cannot be taxed against either party, 1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 3540, I think the decree should be affirmed.

The remaining question is whether an affidavit of publication of a tax petition, taken before the publisher of the newspaper in which the petition was published, he acting as notary public, is void for his interest; the publisher not being a party to the tax proceeding.

Counsel conceded that if the notary was disqualified for interest, the court acquired no jurisdiction to enter the tax decree.

The nature of the interest which will disqualify a notary depends…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Horbach v. TyrrellNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Bowden v. ParrishSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
  3. Cook v. FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Havemeyer v. DahnNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. McFarlane v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Keyes v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Loucks v. Carl Foster & Wards Used CarsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  3. Keyes v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Orville J. Loucks, Next Friend of Walter L. Loucks, a Minor v. Carl Foster & Wards Used Cars, a Co-Partnership, Consisting of George C. Simons and Daniel E. Fox, Orville J. Loucks v. Carl Foster & Wards Used Cars, a Co-Partnership, Consisting of George C. Simons and Daniel E. FoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API