Legal Opinion
Leibitzke v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 19, 1982No. C81-2125PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WHITE, District Judge.
At the time this lawsuit was commenced the plaintiffs were non-agreement employees of the Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) working in its Technical Services Laboratory at Cleveland, Ohio. On October 7, 1981 they received notice from an officer of the Company that their present position, title, and pay rate would be transferred to Pennsylvania, effective November 3, 1981 and employees who intended to transfer should notify Conrail in writing by October 30, 1981 or be considered to have terminated their employment. Under Title V of the Regional…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Crookham v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1978
3Cited by2 opinions
- Edison Electric Institute v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Edison Electric Institute v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Association of American Railroads, Tampa Electric Company, Carolina Power & Light Company, Western Coal Traffic League, Alabama Power Company, Eastern Coal Transportation Conference, Intervenors. Edison Electric Institute v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Tampa Electric Company, Association of American Railroads, Duke Power Company, Carolina Power & Light Company, Commonwealth Edison Co., Intervenors. Alabama Power Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Commonwealth Edison Co., Intervenors. Western Coal Traffic League v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Eastern Coal Transportation Conference v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985