Defrees v. US, Through US Forest Service
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REDDEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Ellen, Lyle, and Lowell De-frees bring this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act alleging that defendant United States Forest Service negligently failed to suppress a forest fire that damaged their property. The parties agreed to bifurcate trial of liability and damages. The liability phase was tried to the court on March 27 and 28, 1990. I find that defendant is not liable for plaintiffs’ damages.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs own land adjacent to Forest Service land within the Burnt Powder Fire Zone of the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, near Baker,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rayonier Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Leland J. Seyler and Aileene Seyler, Husband and Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Arizona Maintenance Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Gattman v. FavroOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Gattman v. FavroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harry Stoller & Co. v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Green v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Alfredo Esquivel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Adams v. City of Tenakee SpringsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.