Legal Opinion

Defrees v. US, Through US Forest Service

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 10, 1990No. 88-868 REPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REDDEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Ellen, Lyle, and Lowell De-frees bring this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act alleging that defendant United States Forest Service negligently failed to suppress a forest fire that damaged their property. The parties agreed to bifurcate trial of liability and damages. The liability phase was tried to the court on March 27 and 28, 1990. I find that defendant is not liable for plaintiffs’ damages.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs own land adjacent to Forest Service land within the Burnt Powder Fire Zone of the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, near Baker,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rayonier Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Leland J. Seyler and Aileene Seyler, Husband and Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Arizona Maintenance Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Gattman v. FavroOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Gattman v. FavroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harry Stoller & Co. v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Green v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Alfredo Esquivel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. Adams v. City of Tenakee SpringsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API