Legal Opinion

Martinez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 28, 1985No. 3-84-191-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EARL W. SMITH, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of bribery and assessed punishment at imprisonment for five years. Tex.Pen.Code Ann. § 36.-02(a)(1) (Supp.1985). The sole issue on appeal is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the judgment of conviction. We find that it is.

Appellant was tried on an indictment alleging that he:

intentionally and knowingly solicit[ed] and agree[d] to accept and accepted] from Pedro Zepeda a benefit, to-wit: United States currency, as consideration for the said defendant’s decision as a public servant to-wit: a Round Rock, Texas police officer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Carlsen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. McCallum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. TraitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. TraitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  3. Cotter & Sons, Inc. v. BJ Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Jesus Gandara A/K/A Jesus Gandara, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2016
  5. Cary, David FrederickTexas Supreme Court · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API