Legal Opinion

In re D'Amico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 24, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 24, 1991, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged for refusing to move her car from a fire zone. According to the employer’s representative, claimant was told that she would be terminated if she refused to move the car and that the area where she was parked was located on the employer’s premises and marked with a “no parking” sign. He also testified that the maintenance crew goes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of WoodsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. In re the Claim of CentineoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. In re the Claim of GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. In re the Claim of RossanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Condell v. BressCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. Condell v. BressCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  3. In re the Claim of GroverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API