Legal Opinion

Jarrell v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 8, 1949No. 5 Div. 477PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

It is familiar law that to justify the reversal of a trial court for refusing a special written instruction requested by a party to the suit or prosecution, such instruction must be couched “in the correct and appropriate terms of the law.” Hudson v. State, 217 Ala. 479, 116 So. 800, 802; Ex parte State ex rel. Attorney General, 211 Ala. 1, 100 So. 312.

The Court of Appeals reversed in the instant case because the trial court refused defendant’s written instruction, to-wit: “The court charges the jury that the evidence in this case is circumstantial and that before you can…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex parte AcreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. McDowell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Gilmore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  4. Pickens v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  5. Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. Golden v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Dominique Ray v. State of Alabama.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. White v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API