Jarrell v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
It is familiar law that to justify the reversal of a trial court for refusing a special written instruction requested by a party to the suit or prosecution, such instruction must be couched “in the correct and appropriate terms of the law.” Hudson v. State, 217 Ala. 479, 116 So. 800, 802; Ex parte State ex rel. Attorney General, 211 Ala. 1, 100 So. 312.
The Court of Appeals reversed in the instant case because the trial court refused defendant’s written instruction, to-wit: “The court charges the jury that the evidence in this case is circumstantial and that before you can…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex parte AcreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- McDowell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Gilmore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Pickens v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Golden v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
- Dominique Ray v. State of Alabama.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- White v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.