In re Griggs
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
On petition for rehearing.
1Opinion of the Court
HOOK, Circuit Judge.
Counsel misconceive the limited office of the writ they sought and the effect of the opinion of this court denying their .application. The situation was as follows:
The defendants resided in Illinois. As executors they had procured ancillary letters in Minnesota where part of the estate of the testator was located. The plaintiff sued- them in Minnesota, both as individuals and as executors, and real property of the estate in that state was attached. Instead of contesting the attachment and the jurisdiction of the court, they voluntarily entered their appearance in both…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Remington v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- McDonald v. NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Wetmore v. KarrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Van Doren v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1899
- In Re Metropolitan Trust Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schulenberg v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Sweeney v. Greenwood Index-Journal Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1941
- Salyers v. United States ex rel. Indiana Quarries Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- United States v. FrenchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Belknap Hardware &. Mfg. Co. v. Ohio River Contract Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.