Legal Opinion

Crawford Finance Co. v. Derby

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1939PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

This was an action in replevin for an automobile. At the close of the evidence the trial court, on motion of the defendant, entered a judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff appealed on questions of law.

Numerous errors are assigned, but the only ones that will receive consideration herein are the granting of defendant’s motion for judgment, and the overruling of a similar motion by the plaintiff.

The material facts are undisputed. In substance, they are: For some time prior to August 13, 1938, Harry N. Bedell had been an authorized dealer in Hudson-Terraplane automobiles. On May 31,1938, he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. City Loan & Savings Co. v. TaggartOhio Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Turpin v. Standard Reliance Insurance Co.(Mutual)Nebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Loyal's Auto Exchange, Inc. v. MunchNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Calhoun v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  4. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DrawbaughNebraska Supreme Court · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API