Legal Opinion
Smith v. Byrne
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1919No. Docket No. 116PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from Wayne; Hosmer (George S.), J. Bill by Albert E. Smith and others against Dennis Byrne and others to enjoin the violation of building restrictions. From a decree for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
The decree appealed from reads as follows:
“The above entitled cause having come on to be heard in open court, on pleadings and proofs, the testimony on behalf of plaintiffs and defendants having been offered in open court, and having been duly considered, counsel for plaintiffs and defendants having been heard, and it appearing to the court:
“1. That complainants Albert E. Smith and Josephine Smith, his wife, are seized and possessed of a legal estate in lot 101, Voigt Park subdivision of E. W. Voigt’s subdivision of Voigt Park Farm, the same being a part of quarter section 36, 10,000 acre…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Gersten v. Western Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Hansen v. FacioneMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Cooke v. TaubeMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Matthew T Thiel v. David L GoyingsMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
- Matthew T Thiel v. David L GoyingsMichigan Supreme Court · 2019