Legal Opinion

Westchester & Philadelphia R. R. v. Broomall

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 1, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the Common Pleas of Delaware County to review a judgment for plaintiff in an action for breach of contract. The facts and the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the ■court.

1Opinion of the Court

*588Opinion by

Mr. Justice Green:

The contract upon which the present action was brought was a verbal contract, by which the plaintiff, according to his. allegation, agreed to give a piece of land to the defendant in consideration that the defendant would erect a freight station upon the ground and give him a pass for one year for himself and his wife. A deed for the premises was made to the defendant reciting a nominal consideration of $1 and the pass, ivas delivered to the plaintiff, but the freight station was not built; and this action was brought to recover damages for breach - of the contract.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Busbee v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Pressley v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API