Anchor Casualty Company v. Miller
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Due to the absence of Associate Justice Leroy E. Matson because of illness on the date set for hearing of this appeal, the case was heard by six of the justices of this court, and they being equally divided as to the issues presented on appeal, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed without opinion.
Affirmed.
Mr. Justice Loevinger, not having been a member of the court at the time of the argument and submission, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Armstrong v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
3Cited by3 opinions
- Associated Builders & Contractors v. VenturaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Associated Builders & Contractors v. VenturaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Shatek v. George A. Hormel & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989