Legal Opinion

Royal Bead Novelty Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 10, 1972No. C.D. 4353, Port of New York, Court 67/78363-45352-67 on American goods returnedPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALETZ, Judge:

This action involves the proper rate of duty on glass beads that plaintiff, a manufacturer and importer of costume jewelry, exported in 1965 from the United States to Austria where a half-coating was placed thereon which imparted to the beads a so-called Aurora Borealis finish. The merchandise was then returned to the United States in 1966 and assessed duty of 14 percent under item 741.30 of the tariff schedules as—

Beads, bugles, and spangles (except natural, cultured, or imitation pearls), not strung (except temporarily) and not set:

Other

Plaintiff has challenged this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Engl v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Gifford v. Travelers Protective Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  3. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, a Corporation v. Superior Insulating Tape Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  4. Allen Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Motorists Insurance Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  2. United States v. Borge International, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API