Legal Opinion
Bustos v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 16, 1973No. Nos. 72-1178, 72-1179 and 72-1209PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN H. PRATT, District Judge:
This case challenges the legality of the system whereby the Immigration and Naturalization Service1 for many years has permitted and continues to permit Mexican aliens 2 to commute either daily or seasonally from their place of residence in Mexico to employment in the United States. Plaintiffs-appellants Robert Bustos, an American citizen, and Lupe Murquia, a Mexican national permanently residing in the United States, are farm workers in California. The United Farm Workers Organizing Committee is an organization of farm workers whose purpose is to secure higher…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. MezeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Massachusetts Trustees of Eastern Gas & Fuel Associates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bonetti v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Texas State AFL-CIO v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Gooch v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burch v. Amsterdam CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Robert Bustos, and Lupe Murquia v. John Mitchell, Attorney General of the United States Robert Bustos, United Farm Workers Organizing Committee v. John Mitchell, Attorney General of the United States Robert Bustos, Cirstobal Cardona v. John Mitchell, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973