Legal Opinion
Eli Lilly and Co. v. Emisphere Technologies, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided January 6, 2006No. 103CV1504DFHTABPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON COUNTERCLAIM FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT
HAMILTON, District Judge.
Beginning in February 1997, plaintiff Eli Lilly and Company and defendant Emisphere Technologies, Inc. agreed to collaborate in research on new chemical “carrier” compounds. The goal was to use these molecules to deliver therapeutic proteins to patients orally. Through mechanisms that are not well understood, the carriers may enable the therapeutic proteins to bypass the digestive processes. Those processes ordinarily break down proteins into their component amino acids, but with carriers,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Breed v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Teitelbaum Holdings, Ltd. v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Donald L. Terwilliger, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Donald L. Terwilliger, III and John Terwilliger, Defendants-Appellants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Cruden v. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mayo Clinic Jacksonville v. Alzheimer's Institute of America, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
- CO2 Technologies, Inc. v. Paper-Pak IndustriesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2011
- Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation v. Roku, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025