Legal Opinion
Harlow & Jones, Inc. v. Advance Steel Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 30, 1976No. Civ. A. 5-70979PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FEIKENS, District Judge.
This is an action in contract, brought by the seller, Harlow and Jones, Inc. (hereinafter “Harlow”), against the buyer, Advance Steel Co. (hereinafter “Advance”), to recover damages and costs for an alleged breach of an agreement to purchase 1000 tons of imported European steel. Defendant denies liability, claiming that the shipment of steel was late and was therefore properly rejected under the contract. The parties agree that their respective rights and liabilities in this action are governed by the Uniform Commercial Code. 1 The pertinent facts, as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nobs Chemical, U.S.A., Inc. And Calmon-Hill Trading Corp., Cross-Appellees v. Koppers Co., Inc., Cross-Appellant, Schenectady Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Monte Carlo Shirt, Inc. v. Daewoo International (America) Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Phillips Puerto Rico Core, Inc. v. Tradax Petroleum Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- National Controls, Inc. v. Commodore Business MacHines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Scott Brass, Inc. v. C & C Metal Products Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.