Legal Opinion

Jewel Tea Co. v. City of Cartersville

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 9, 1938No. 12059PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

The question in this ease is whether the court erred in refusing an interlocutory injunction as prayed by the plaintiff. The Jewel Tea Company by its petition as amended sought an injunction against the City of Cartersville and L. Y. Payne as chief of police, to restrain the defendants from enforcing against the plaintiff and its agents an ordinance adopted by the City of Cartersville on April 16, 1937, and reading as follows:

“ Section 1. The practice of going in and upon private residences in the City of Cartersville, and upon the public streets of *800the City of Cartersville, by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Paulk v. Mayor of SycamoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Mayor of Shellman v. SaxonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. Oakland CitySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. City of Bainbridge v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. Universal Film Exchanges Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Staub v. Mayor &C. of BaxleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  3. Spur Distributing Co. v. Mayor C. of AmericusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Walker v. Mayor of CarrolltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Sarrio v. Gwinnett CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API