Andrade v. Dillman

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 MARCUS ANDRADE, et al., Case No.: 2:20-cv-01021-JAD-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 8 v. [Docket No. 25] 9 JAPHETH DILLMAN, et al., 10 Defendant(s). 11 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for an extension of time to serve Defendants 12 Japheth Dillman and Block Bits AML Holdings (“Defendants”) and for leave to serve Defendants 13 by publication. Docket No. 25. The motion is properly resolved without a hearing. See Local 14 Rule 78-1. For the reasons discussed below, the motion to extend the time to serve Defendants is 15…