Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Bailey

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1981No. Docket 47831, 47832Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBronson, P.J.

I concur with the majority in all respects except as to part II of their opinion. I believe that personal possession of the firearm is a prerequisite to a conviction under MCL 750.227b; MSA 28.424(2). See my opinion in People v Bridges, 98 Mich App 436, 439-440; 296 NW2d 275 (1980).

I would vacate Boyd’s felony-firearm conviction.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. BridgesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980