Commonwealth v. Pugh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EAGEN, Chief Justice.
Julius Pugh was convicted by a jury of murder of the third degree. Post-verdict motions were denied and a prison sentence of ten to twenty years was imposed.1 This appeal followed.
*448Pugh contends he is entitled to a new trial because of certain alleged errors in the prosecution process. The Commonwealth argues these issues have not been preserved for appellate review because Pugh failed to comply with Commonwealth v. Blair, 460 Pa. 31, 331 A.2d 213 (1975), which requires that assignments of error be presented in written post-verdict motions. We do not accept the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. GraceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. CornishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. EllerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
3Cited by50 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GravelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. WatersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. CargoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.