Legal Opinion

Crook v. Rider

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 20, 1922Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). It is established by the evidence that when Sudberry exchanged his farm for the town lots in question with Morris, the latter executed a deed to said town lots to Sudberry and Eider. This fact is testified to by E. D. McMullen. It is true that Morris stated that he did not know that Eider was concerned in the transaction, but he -admits that some months afterwards Sudberry returned his deed to the town lots in which both Sudberry and Rider were named as grantees, and that he executed another deed to the property in which Sudberry alone was named as grantee.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shenoy v. PhippsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API