Legal Opinion

Talcott v. Jonasson

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 15, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from so much of an order of the City Court of the city of Hew York as denies the application of the plaintiff for an order directing the defendant-respondents or their attorneys to serve upon the attorneys for the plaintiff their bill of costs with notice of retaxation thereof, and for the costs of that motion.

1Opinion of the CourtFbeedmab, P. J.

A judgment was rendered in the City Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants on the 2d day of July, 1903; the plaintiff appealed to this court and .this court affirmed the judgment, with costs. The defendant-respondents thereupon, without notice to the plaintiff’s attorneys, entered a judgment in said City Court for the sum of $102.10, their costs and disbursements upon the appeal; thereafter the defendant-respondents served upon the plaintiff’s attorneys their bill of costs with notice of retaxation. On the day and hour set forth in said notice, plaintiff’s attorneys…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hewitt v. . City MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dame v. MaynardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API