Legal Opinion

HCR ManorCare v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

HCR ManorCare (Employer) appeals an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) decision to reassign Employer’s request for a Utilization Review Determination of Barbara Bollman’s (Claimant) medical treatment by Mark LoDico, M.D. (Dr. LoDico) to a Utilization Review Organization (URO). We affirm because it was within the WCJ’s jurisdiction to order the reassignment of this case to the URO.

Claimant sustained a work-related back injury on November 13, 2001, while working for Employer for which she received…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. County of Allegheny v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Schemmer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Gazzola v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hcr Manorcare v. Wcab (Bollman)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Sexton v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Sexton v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API