Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Essex v. Riley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1977No. 77-97PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Although the parties do not mention the. matter in their briefs, we take judicial notice of the fact that relator, Mr. Martin W. Essex, is no longer the Ohio Superintendent of Public Instruction. Since Essex was a defendant in the pending action only in his official capacity and has no present interest in the litigation, no current reason exists which would require the imposition of the extraordinary remedy of prohibition in his behalf.

The motion for a permanent writ is denied.

Writ denied.

Celebrezze, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. O’Neill, C. J., and Herbert, J., dissent. W.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State, Dept. of Mental Health v. ReynoldsOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API