Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Copeland

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 1998PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, J.:

The Commonwealth challenges the trial court’s order precluding the testimony of three prosecution witnesses whose criminal history records the Commonwealth refused to provide. We affirm.

Martin Copeland was accused by the proprietors of a video store of fading to return a videotape. The storeowners, David and Edwin Hess, filed a private criminal complaint for theft of leased property. While the theft charge was pending, Copeland allegedly began to engage in a pattern of harassment and threats against the Hess brothers. They claimed that Copeland’s unlawful conduct took place over a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. MooseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. OstroskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Com. v. Diaz, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Com. v. Dunbar, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Com. v. Easley, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Com. v. Rawls, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API