Commonwealth v. Copeland
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, J.:
The Commonwealth challenges the trial court’s order precluding the testimony of three prosecution witnesses whose criminal history records the Commonwealth refused to provide. We affirm.
Martin Copeland was accused by the proprietors of a video store of fading to return a videotape. The storeowners, David and Edwin Hess, filed a private criminal complaint for theft of leased property. While the theft charge was pending, Copeland allegedly began to engage in a pattern of harassment and threats against the Hess brothers. They claimed that Copeland’s unlawful conduct took place over a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. MooseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. OstroskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Com. v. Diaz, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Dunbar, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Com. v. Easley, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Com. v. Rawls, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.