Legal Opinion

People v. Dodson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 6, 2002No. 5-00-0020PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kuehn

This case arrives for review after a trial that lacked many of the features normally associated with trials conducted under our adversary system of justice. We confront a case where defense counsel promoted, as the process to judgment, a jury waiver and the use of a written stipulation prepared by the prosecutor. Counsel chose to adjudicate the question of her client’s guilt or innocence by way of a stipulated bench trial, conduct that raises the ultimate question for our review. Can a defense lawyer forego an adversarial test of the State’s case and ease the path to conviction on a plea of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. People v. HatteryIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Earl Wayne Wiley v. Dewey Sowders, Superintendent, Kentucky State ReformatoryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. VelezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  2. People v. MadisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. People v. DodsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. People v. MadisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. People v. VaughnAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API