State v. Cooley
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MAUS, Judge.
The defendant was convicted of promoting pornography in the second degree. § 573.030, RSMo 1978 (now repealed). The statutes under which she was convicted defined the third element of pornography as “applying contemporary community standards: ... It lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.” § 573.010(l)(c), RSMo 1978, (now repealed). She contends her conviction was invalid because Pope v. Illinois, 481 U.S. 497, 107 S.Ct. 1918, 95 L.Ed.2d 439 (1987) in relevant part has defined pornography as “whether a reasonable person would find such value in the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- St. Louis County v. B.A.P., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. BishopMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989