Legal Opinion · Dissent

In the Matter of Justin Alexander Marshall Justin Alexander Marshall v. State of Iowa

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 2, 2011No. 10–0652Published

1DissentCady, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent.

I disagree with the majority’s arrest and release interpretation of the material witness statutes. Under that interpretation, a material witness may be arrested if he or she would be unavailable for service of a subpoena, but then must be released once the trial subpoena has been served. According to the majority, release must occur even if the witness has given every indication that he or she will disregard the trial subpoena. This interpretation seems impractical; renders Iowa’s statute different from other material witness statutes in the nation; and, most…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Galbraith v. County of Santa ClaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. State v. Hernandez-LopezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  4. State v. Iowa District Court for Johnson CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  5. Knepper v. Monticello State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API