Legal Opinion
Horne v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 16, 1930No. 7714PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
The court did not err in overruling the special demurrers. The indictment ivas not vag-ue, nor indefinite, nor uncertain. It was not necessary that the indictment should name the particular portion of the stream where the defendants had fished. A charge in the indictment that the defendants had fished in the named fresh-water stream within Long County was suffi*639cient. It was not essential that the indictment should specify what was the closed season for fishing in Long County. That was a matter of law, and not of fact.
Section 23 of the act of 1925 (Ga. Laws 1925, p. 308) is not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. MeltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Caldwell v. BarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Coleman v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Haney v. Commissioners of Bartow CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Phinizy v. EveSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Holcombe v. Georgia Milk Producers ConfederationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Thacker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Sofeico v. HeffernanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
- Maner v. DykesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Hines v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.