Delia v. Caprio
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Writ of error to review a judgment of the District Court of Waterbury, Peasley, J. At the April term, 1906, to which the writ was returnable, a plea of nul tiel record was filed, whereupon an order of reference to the State Referee was made, as of course. Rules of Court, p. 103, § 38. His report, returned to the June term, found the issue for the defendant in error.
Read the full summary
Writ of error to review a judgment of the District Court of Waterbury, Peasley, J. At the April term, 1906, to which the writ was returnable, a plea of nul tiel record was filed, whereupon an order of reference to the State Referee was made, as of course. Rules of Court, p. 103, § 38. His report, returned to the June term, found the issue for the defendant in error. Before the court had accepted the report, the plaintiffs in error moved to amend their writ to conform to the record as described in the report, and such an amendment was allowed, on payment of costs, including those of the…
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The original action in the District Court was against Michael Delia and Catherine P. Delia, his wife. The complaint alleged that the record title to certain lands in Watertown was in her; that it had been conveyed to her by him, through an intermediate grantee, by fraudulent conveyances without any valuable consideration, to defraud the plaintiff, to whom he was indebted; that these lands constituted the only property of Michael Delia out of which the plaintiff’s demand could be satisfied; that the plaintiff, two days after the conveyances were recorded, had attached them in a suit on his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bouton v. BeersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Davenport v. BradleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822
3Cited by1 opinion
- Doty v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936