Legal Opinion

Krahl v. Lehmann

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 16, 1955No. 12812PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

This is a will contest which was tried before a jury. The will was admitted to probate and, thereafter, "appellants filed a suit under Article 5534 to contest the validity of the will. A reversal of the court’s judgment, which sustained the validity of the will, is sought on the grounds that (1) two credible witnesses, as required by Article 8283, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats., did not witness the will, (2) counsel for appellees probably caused harm in arguing the effect of Article 3716, the dead man statute, and (3) the evidence failed to overcome a presumption of undue influence…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Brackenridge v. Roberts and McIntyreTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Parks v. CaudleTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Brackenridge v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Ragsdale v. RagsdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Leahy v. TimonTexas Supreme Court · 1919

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lehmann v. KrahlTexas Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API