Legal Opinion

United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Industrial Instrument Corporation v. Paul Hardeman, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 12, 1963No. 19855PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

After a lengthy hearing in this cause, a Miller Act suit, in which the Use-plaintiff, Industrial Instrument Corp. (IIC), a supplier of equipment under Atlas Missile contracts, brought suit against the general contractor, Paul Hardeman, Inc., its surety on the Miller Act payment bond, and the sub-contractor with whom IIC had a direct contractual relationship, this cause came on to be heard on the motions for summary judgment of the Use-plaintiff and of the defendants.

After weeks of deposition taking and extended efforts to simplify the myriad complex controverted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Instrument Corp. v. Paul Hardeman, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1962

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Carolyn HUCKEBY, Plaintiff, v. FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS, Defendant-Appellee, v. Alice BOBO, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Exhibitors Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. Fred W. Klinge, M. D. v. Lutheran Charities Association of St. Louis, a Corporation, D/B/A Lutheran Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  5. Henry Gerrard Clay v. Equifax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API