Legal Opinion

Harkness v. Julian

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 15, 1873PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Green Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtVories, Judge

This action was brought on a promissory note. The plaintiff in his original petition, stated that he was the administrator of the estate of one J. H. Elam, deceased, and described himself in the caption of' the petition as such, and charged, that the defendants together with one "W. F. McFall‘by their promissory note dated, etc., for value, had promised to pay said Elam the sum of ninety dollars four months after date, with ten per cent, interest; that fifteen dollars had been paid on said note; that the balance of the note was unpaid; that since the date of the note Elam had died, and that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wellman v. Dismukes & GlascockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  2. Hayden's Executors v. MarmadukeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
  3. Martin v. Martin's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  4. Thompson v. MoselySupreme Court of Missouri · 1860

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walker v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Bennett v. McCanseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  3. Burlington Voluntary Relief Department v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Gewe v. HanszenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API