Legal Opinion

Harrosh v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 5, 2023No. 2:21-cv-01969Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Michael Harrosh, No. 2:21-cv-01969-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency; George and 15 Virginia Johannessen, 16 Defendants. 17 18 In this action, Michael Harrosh challenges the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency’s 19 | approval of George and Virginia Johannessen’s proposal to build a pier on the shore of Lake 20 | Tahoe. See generally Am. Compl., ECF No. 52. This court has authority to hear that challenge 21 | under the terms of the Tahoe Regional Planning Compact,

Pub. L.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blaine P. Thompson v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Mount Lemmon Fire Dist. v. GuidoSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  3. Willie Goffney, Jr. v. Xavier BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  4. Hyatt v. GelbCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API