Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. Evatt
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSohngen, J.
The sole question in this case is whether the minimum balances maintained by appellant in the minor bank accounts outside Ohio had a situs in Ohio for the purpose of taxation.
The general rule is that intangibles have a tax situs at the domicile of the owner, and it is well established that the domicile of a corporation is the state of its organization. McBride, Exrx., v. City of Jersey City, 19 N. J. Misc., 637, 22 A. (2d), 567; Commonwealth v. Mundy Corp., 346 Pa., 482, 30 A. (2d), 878; In re Trus con Steel Co., 246 Mich., 174, 224 N. W., 653; Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co., Exr., v. City of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co. v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Commonwealth v. the Mundy Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Hunt v. TurnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- In Re Truscon Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
- C. F. Kettering, Inc. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State, Ex Rel. Consumers League v. RatchfordOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Austin Co. v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1963