Legal Opinion

Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. Evatt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1948No. 30851PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSohngen, J.

The sole question in this case is whether the minimum balances maintained by appellant in the minor bank accounts outside Ohio had a situs in Ohio for the purpose of taxation.

The general rule is that intangibles have a tax situs at the domicile of the owner, and it is well established that the domicile of a corporation is the state of its organization. McBride, Exrx., v. City of Jersey City, 19 N. J. Misc., 637, 22 A. (2d), 567; Commonwealth v. Mundy Corp., 346 Pa., 482, 30 A. (2d), 878; In re Trus con Steel Co., 246 Mich., 174, 224 N. W., 653; Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co., Exr., v. City of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co. v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Commonwealth v. the Mundy Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Hunt v. TurnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  4. In Re Truscon Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. C. F. Kettering, Inc. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. Consumers League v. RatchfordOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Austin Co. v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API