Forbus and Nicholson v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Weltner, Justice.
We granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals to consider whether a letter drafted hy counsel for the appellants and delivered to the District Attorney reasonably might be construed as a demand for trial, so as to invoke the provisions of Code Ann. § 27-1901 under the standard of State v. Adamczyk, 162 Ga. App. 288 (290 SE2d 149) (1982). After consideration, we approve the holding in Adamczyk and find it applicable to this case. See Forbus v. State, 162 Ga. App. 307 (290 SE2d 559) (1982). It should be noted that Adamczyk is consistent with our recent holdings in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. AdamczykCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- State v. MemingerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- State v. MadiganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- McCarty v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Forbus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Getz v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Dickerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.