Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Council of Hamtramck v. Hamtramck City Clerk

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1938No. Calendar 40,159Published

1ConcurrencePotter, J.

The city council-of the city of "Hamtramck seeks mandamus to compel the city clerk of the city to sign so-called emergency bonds. The city clerk refused to sign them because of doubt as to the legality of the proposed bond issue.

Plaintiff, January 27, 1938, adopted the following resolution:

“That this council does hereby declare the present business depression to be a calamity affectihg most of the people of the city of Hamtramck, and does hereby declare an exigency and emergency to exist involving the peace, health and safety of the city of Hamtramck.”

February 25, 1938, plaintiff adopted a…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Erwin v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  2. American Aniline Products, Inc. v. Lock HavenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Attorney General ex rel. Barbour v. LindsayMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. City of Kalamazoo v. TitusMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. City of Los Angeles v. TeedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API