People v. Thurman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied without a hearing that part of the motion of defendant seeking suppression of physical evidence seized from his girlfriend’s residence. Defendant’s motion to suppress did not *988contain sworn allegations of fact sufficient to raise an issue of fact with respect to standing (see, CPL 710.60 [3] [b]; People v Whitfield, 81 NY2d 904, 906). Further, in opposition to the motion, the People submitted the unequivocal Grand Jury testimony of defendant that he did not reside at the searched premises, thereby establishing that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. ChappleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. BetheaNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. TannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. WhitfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. JamisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. FieldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. SappAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. CasianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025