Aker v. J. J. Fredella Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
A dismissal was granted on the ground that no contract was proven. Under the evidence this was a question of fact or a mixed question of law and fact. All the acts and words, spoken or written, may be considered in determining whether the necessary mutual assent is established. It was for the court to determine as a fact whether the defendant, when, after the prior letters and negotiations between the parties, it sent its letter, dated March 14,1927, inclosing therewith a “ copy of contract for hauling, with prices as quoted today by your Mr. Beard,” intended to make an offer; whether the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- White v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Den Norske Ameriekalinje Actiesselskabet v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Stevens v. AmsinckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- BROWN BROS. v. Beam Constr.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Arnold v. Gramercy Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Brown Bros. Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Beam Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- National Lawyers Guild v. Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Monsoon Blockchain Storage, Inc. v. Magic Micro Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.