Legal Opinion

Fingerhut v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 23, 1979No. 48271PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, Justice.

Manny and Rose Fingerhut filed separate 1970 Minnesota income tax returns. They each properly reported their Minnesota gross taxable income which is defined to be Federal adjusted gross income. The Federal adjusted gross income was derived by including a deduction of 50 percent of net long-term capital gains. In 1974, the Finger-huts filed a claim for refund, alleging that they were entitled to deduct under Minnesota statutes the remaining 50 percent of their long-term capital gains. The trial court disallowed the additional deduction. We affirm.

The facts in this case have been…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Gale v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Minnesota Power & L. Co. v. Personal Prop. Tax, Etc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Northland Country Club v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. State v. ElamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Welfare of the Children of L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  2. In re 2010 Gubernatorial ElectionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API