Legal Opinion

Freeman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 9, 2000No. Nos. 1475-99, 1476-99PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

The opinion of the Court was delivered

2Per curiam

A jury convicted Appellant of delivery of a controlled substance and assessed punishment at confinement for life. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Freeman v. State, 998 S.W.2d 379 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 1999). We granted Appellant’s petition for discretionary review to address the Court of Appeals’ disposition of Appellant’s Brady1 and entrapment claims.

Appellant has died. His counsel has filed a motion to abate appeal and forwarded a certified copy of the death certificate. The death of an appellant during the pen-dency of his appeal…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Ryan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Freeman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999

4Cited by25 opinions

  1. Adam W. Ruffin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2012
  2. Adrian Simon Solis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
  3. Bryan Ray Parrack v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  4. Bryan Ray Parrack v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  5. Bryan Ray Parrack v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API